From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Netfilter vs commercial
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:31:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411A902E.1010404@pbl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040809093022.5842e85e@mgalepc.utilitran.com>
Michael Gale wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know this question has most likely come up a few times and most people ask about performance and through put. But my
> question seems to me a little different.
>
> I would like to know how people on this list ... which I know might be a biased opinion feel how a Netfilter firewall
> box .. properly configured would compare in security to a commercial firewall.
I'd say that security is at about same level, if you keep the products
updated to the latest release, and if you do not have applications
running on the firewall itself (like you do, squid is appliaction).
Use product that you feel comfortable with, and that has features you
need. No point in using Netfilter if it lacks a feature from CheckPoint
that you need. Or using CheckPoint if it lacks a feature from Netfilter
that you need.
Sadly, at some places that I used to work in the past (luckily not
working there anymore), the two main arguments (usually used by higher
management) for going commercial was that "if we pay, we will have
someboy to blame when things are not working". And "commercial looks
more professional". Totally stupid and neither of those has anything
with common sense. Hope it will not be the case at your place.
--
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca> Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator 1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276 Winnipeg, MB R3T 1L7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-11 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-09 15:30 Netfilter vs commercial Michael Gale
2004-08-09 15:56 ` Antony Stone
2004-08-09 16:02 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-08-11 21:46 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-08-11 22:11 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-08-11 21:31 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-09 16:34 Jason Opperisano
2004-08-09 16:48 Mike O
2004-08-09 17:03 ` Antony Stone
2004-08-09 17:35 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-08-09 18:15 ` Antony Stone
2004-08-11 21:31 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-08-09 17:39 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-08-09 17:45 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-08-09 18:24 Jason Opperisano
2004-08-09 18:40 ` Antony Stone
2004-08-11 21:40 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411A902E.1010404@pbl.ca \
--to=amilivojevic@pbl.ca \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox