Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Turley <pturley@rocksteady.com>
To: Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Question about limited primary addresses
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:41:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4150A00C.7030306@rocksteady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <415080A6.30003@rocksteady.com>

I've discovered the source of this problem. Unfortunately, the cause is 
so embarassing that I'm not able to discuss it. I will now go commit 
sepuku. Thank you for your time and kind attention.

Patrick Turley wrote:
> Jason Opperisano wrote:
>  > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:51, Patrick Turley wrote:
>  > # uname -a
>  > Linux vmg2 2.4.26-gentoo-r9 #2 Fri Sep 3 07:13:35 EDT 2004 i686 Intel(R)
>  > Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.20GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>  >
>  > # ip -4 add sh eth0 | wc -l
>  > 513
>  >
>  > # ip -4 add sh eth0 | head
>  > 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
>  >     inet 10.1.0.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.1.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.2.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.3.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.4.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.5.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.6.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.7.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.1.8.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >
>  > # ip -4 add sh eth0 | tail
>  >     inet 10.2.246.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.247.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.248.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.249.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.250.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.251.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.252.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.253.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.254.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >     inet 10.2.255.1/24 scope global eth0
>  >
>  > from a machine assigned 10.1.1.100/16 and 10.2.1.100/16, i can ping:
>  >
>  > 10.1.0.1, 10.1.1.1, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.1.4.1, 10.2.254.1, 10.2.25.1,
>  > 10.1.25.1, 10.2.255.1
>  >
>  > ...on the test machine with all the 10.[1-2].[0-255].1/24 addresses.
> 
> I've found that ping is not a good test. Even with the networking 
> broken, ping still works. Can you try to SSH/telnet/ftp/foo to the test 
> machine?
> 
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2004-09-21 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-20  3:35 Question about limited primary addresses Patrick Turley
2004-09-20 13:43 ` Jason Opperisano
2004-09-21 18:51   ` Patrick Turley
2004-09-21 19:21     ` Jason Opperisano
2004-09-21 19:27       ` Patrick Turley
2004-09-21 21:41         ` Patrick Turley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4150A00C.7030306@rocksteady.com \
    --to=pturley@rocksteady.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=opie@817west.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox