Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Primero <primero@fastwebnet.it>
To: Alistair Tonner <Alistair@nerdnet.ca>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Dual ISPs - controlled path for certain ports - ip route 2	balancing for others
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:33:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4152987C.90100@fastwebnet.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409221315.05822.Alistair@nerdnet.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1250 bytes --]

Alistair Tonner wrote:

>	
>	 I'm wondering if 
>	there are rules I can use (consider that the webserver/mailserver and FTP 
>	server are sadly on the firewall at the moment) to force the servers to reply
>	via the DSL or internal lan only, even if the default route points at the
>	cable link? (this would be a quick and dirty solution for me) -- the cablelink will have to shortly support a VPN tunnel back to work.
>  
>
i was using Iproute2 like u until a day i decided to "man iptables" ....

i've found in EXTENSIONS TARGET section:

....
ROUTE

       This is used to explicitly override the core network stack's 
routing decision.  mangle table.

       --oif ifname
              Route the packet through `ifname' network interface

       --iif ifname
              Change the packet's incoming interface to `ifname'

       --gw IP_address
              Route the packet via this gateway

       --continue
              Behave like a non-terminating target and continue 
traversing the rules.  Not valid in combination with `--iif'
....

this way u can use a normal matching syntax of iptables and change the 
routing decision about the "interesting traffic".
I hope it works since i had no time yet to try it out ... let us know :)

bye

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-23  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-22 17:15 Dual ISPs - controlled path for certain ports - ip route 2 balancing for others Alistair Tonner
2004-09-23  9:33 ` Primero [this message]
2004-09-23 13:18   ` Alistair Tonner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4152987C.90100@fastwebnet.it \
    --to=primero@fastwebnet.it \
    --cc=Alistair@nerdnet.ca \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox