Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: ip_conntrack_max vs ip_conntrack
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:34:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4154A112.20308@suse.cz> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

could someone please explain me what is the relation between the number
in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max and number of lines in
/proc/net/ip_conntrack?

On one of our very loaded firewalls (with 1GB RAM) we are still getting
"ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet." message. We tried to tweak
all different parameters, e.g. hashsize to up to 1048576,
ip_conntrack_max, ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established, etc.
Unfortunately sooner or later the kernel always starts dropping packets.
At the same time however there are at most a few thousands of lines in
/proc/net/ip_conntrack.

I instrumented the kernel to dump the same output via printk() once
ip_conntrack_count reaches ip_conntrack_max. When I set _max=128 and run
nmap through the firewall it of course very soon prints the "dropping
packets" message, but along with only 6 (=six!) lines of connections.
Where was the rest, 122 connections, lost? What does the
ip_conntrack_count actually count?

Thanks in advance!

Michal Ludvig
- --
SUSE Labs                    mludvig@suse.cz
(+420) 296.545.373        http://www.suse.cz
Personal homepage http://www.logix.cz/michal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBVKEQDDolCcRbIhgRAupGAKCF4F6Mvk0YARZMj5S21vI/95u71ACfWDn2
UVB5lEV0YC58et/rvFbJEEY=
=AryG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


             reply	other threads:[~2004-09-24 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-24 22:34 Michal Ludvig [this message]
2004-09-24 22:49 ` ip_conntrack_max vs ip_conntrack Stephen J Smoogen
2004-09-30  9:59   ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-28  7:59 ` Mohamed Eldesoky
2004-09-28 12:31   ` Alistair Tonner
2004-09-28 12:53     ` Ted Kaczmarek
2004-09-28 14:27   ` Jose Maria Lopez
2004-09-28 14:48     ` Mohamed Eldesoky
2004-09-28 15:19       ` Alistair Tonner
2004-09-30 11:30         ` Mohamed Eldesoky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-27 17:52 Jiann-Ming Su
2004-09-27 18:04 ` Jason Opperisano
2004-09-27 18:57 ` Jose Maria Lopez
2004-09-30 22:48   ` Jiann-Ming Su
2004-09-30 23:03     ` Jason Opperisano
2004-10-19 17:21     ` Jiann-Ming Su

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4154A112.20308@suse.cz \
    --to=mludvig@suse.cz \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox