From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott MacKay Subject: Re: pre 2.6.14 ip_queue - packet shrink issues? Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <418076.8475.qm@web52412.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <20080328134723.GA23603@khasse.inl.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080328134723.GA23603@khasse.inl.fr> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Eric Leblond Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org --- Eric Leblond wrote: > Hello, > > On Friday, 2008 March 28 at 6:07:47 -0700, Scott > MacKay wrote: > > With ip_queue, under the older libipq style > interface > > I seem to be having a problem resizing a mangled > > message smaller under 2.6. It seems like the > contents > > could be changed, but the receiver got the > original > > packet size, like the trim failed or something. > Still > > need to check the details in ethereal, but from > anyone > > using ip_queue or noting improvements in the new > > style, does an issue like this ring any bells? > Thanks > > in advance! > > I think remember such an issue. It has been fixed > and should work with > up-to-date code (I mean with libnetfilter_queue). > > BR, > -- > Eric Leblond > INL: http://www.inl.fr/ > NuFW: http://www.nufw.org/ > Aah...so possibly no fix in the older style? The new design seems easy enough to port to, I was just hoping on not hopping too many revisions from the kernel rev I have in (RHEL 4.5) if possible. I was glad a minor UG within the up2date cleared my huge issue (panic when returning a payload thru libipq) but this of course is just as bad...I had a hope to keep in the RHEL available kernel distros but understand if this was rolled in outside of what is convenient. -Scott ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping