From: Larry LeBlanc <leblanc@inmotiontechnology.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RTSP/NAT query
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 16:09:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418C162A.7060707@inmotiontechnology.com> (raw)
Hello,
I'm trying to determine whether or not I need the rtsp_conntrack module.
I seem to be able to run RTSP through a masquerading gateway without it;
is this just a fluke or are there specific scenarios that rtsp_conntrack
is intended to address? (eg simultaneous users, etc). My testing to date
has been to use Real Player 10 to play video clips off of the Real
Networks website using UDP as the underlying transport. I'm using
iptables 1.2.10 and the following nat/conntrack modules are in place:
iptables
iptable_nat
ip_nat_proto_gre
ip_nat_pptp
ip_conntrack
ip_conntrack_pptp
ip_conntrack_proto_gre
ip_conntrack_mms
Thanks,
Larry
reply other threads:[~2004-11-06 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418C162A.7060707@inmotiontechnology.com \
--to=leblanc@inmotiontechnology.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox