From: Joel Newkirk <firewalldude@newkirk.us>
To: ro0ot <ro0ot@phreaker.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: iptables with policy routing
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:45:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4195BB80.5060702@newkirk.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41939AD2.602@phreaker.net>
ro0ot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below is my Linux firewall network configuration: -
>
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.0.1 -j SNAT --to-source 1.1.1.10
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.1 -j SNAT --to-source 2.2.2.10
>
>
> Below is my split access routing for multiple providers: -
>
> # First ISP
> ip route add 1.1.1.8/30 dev eth0 src 1.1.1.10 table 1
> ip route add default via 1.1.1.9 table 1
>
> # Second ISP
> ip route add 2.2.2.8/30 dev eth1 src 2.2.2.10 table 2
> ip route add default via 2.2.2.9 table 2
>
> #
> ip rule add from 1.1.1.8/30 lookup 1
> ip rule add from 2.2.2.8/30 lookup 2
>
> # My default choice of gateway
> ip route add default via 1.1.1.9
> When I perform a traceroute from a workstation with the IP address of
> 192.168.0.1 and gateway 192.168.0.254, I can see the result of the
> traceroute going through the 1.1.1.9 gateway, why? It suppose to SNAT
> to 2.2.2.10 via 2.2.2.9 gateway.
Happens because your default gateway is 1.1.1.9. 2.2.2.9 is only chosen
when the source IP is 2.2.2.8/30. Problem is, the routing decision is
made BEFORE iptables->nat->POSTROUTING changes the source IP. You will
have to key your routing rules on the private IPs, like so:
ip rule add from 172.16.0.0/24 lookup 1
ip r a from 192.168.0.0/24 lookup 2
(I've gone through various configurations of a linux gateway router
connecting multiple private networks to three T1s: bridge and plain
router, load-balanced and source-routed, and with shaping/routing based
on fwmarks)
j
> Regards,
> ro0ot
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-13 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 17:01 iptables with policy routing ro0ot
2004-11-13 7:45 ` Joel Newkirk [this message]
2004-11-14 17:58 ` ro0ot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4195BB80.5060702@newkirk.us \
--to=firewalldude@newkirk.us \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=ro0ot@phreaker.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox