Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul <lists@loudas.com>
To: "Netfilter Users (List)" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Help with fwmark and shorewall
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:44:05 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41BE4565.7090503@loudas.com> (raw)

I'm using shorewall, 2 ISP connections, and I want to force udp 500 
traffic out one particular interface

here's what I have so far
/etc/shorewall/tcrules:
4       0.0.0.0/0       202.37.230.93   udp     500
4       202.37.230.93   0.0.0.0/0       udp     500


shorewall show mangle | grep MARK
    14  4203 MARK       udp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0 
202.37.230.93       udp dpt:500 MARK set 0x4
     0     0 MARK       udp  --  *      *       202.37.230.93 
0.0.0.0/0           udp dpt:500 MARK set 0x4

routing:
/sbin/ip rule add prio 223 fwmark 4 table 223
/sbin/ip route add default via 202.37.230.65 dev eth2 \
          src 202.37.230.93 proto static table 223

routing rules:
ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local
50:     from all lookup main
201:    from 202.37.230.64/26 lookup 201
202:    from 203.96.212.0/23 lookup 202
222:    from all lookup 222
223:    from all fwmark 0x4 lookup 223
32766:  from all lookup main
32767:  from all lookup default

ip route show table 223
default via 202.37.230.65 dev eth2  proto static  src 202.37.230.93

the load balancing work flawlessly :)
however I have racoon (kernel 2.6.8.1) on the firewall, and only 
sometimes it responds using 202.37.230.93 .. sometimes it uses my other 
ISP connection .. which is no good :(

I've got to the point where I guess I need to use fwmark before routing, 
but it doesn't seem to work :(

Any help

Thanks
Paul.



                 reply	other threads:[~2004-12-14  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41BE4565.7090503@loudas.com \
    --to=lists@loudas.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox