From: malware@t-online.de (Michael Mueller)
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: conntrack has problems with syn-ack-psh set
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:40:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41DA5698.2010403@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050101175016.GA10480@bender.817west.com>
Hi Jason,
you wrote:
> SYN-ACK-PSH is not a valid response to a SYN packet. you will never
What does make you think so? I can not find any hint in RFC973 and
RFC1211 saying so.
IMO it is a perfectly valid reply, even if it a rather unusual one and
might be a case for applying a normalization (here removing the PSH flag
and any data) on it.
Michael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-28 0:59 conntrack has problems with syn-ack-psh set Shaun Savage
2005-01-01 17:50 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-01-04 8:40 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41DA5698.2010403@t-online.de \
--to=malware@t-online.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox