From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raphael Jacquot Subject: Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:44:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4200E762.2020501@imag.fr> References: <61246.57.66.65.39.1107336931.squirrel@57.66.65.39> <4200A1F3.8030609@imag.fr> <5172.57.66.65.39.1107338261.squirrel@57.66.65.39> <4200AB33.1010308@imag.fr> <1107352680.4916.8.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> <63838.57.66.65.39.1107354736.squirrel@57.66.65.39> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <63838.57.66.65.39.1107354736.squirrel@57.66.65.39> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Cc: netfilter Herv=E9 wrote: >=20 > In my case, the point is to help the routing by modifying the source > address. For example, you give eth0 two addresses: 192.168.100.1 and > 192.168.101.1, and eth1: 192.168.100.1 (yes, the same) and 192.168.102.= 1. what's the point ???