Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timothy Earl" <mehimx@gmail.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Feature request: ability to test if rule is loaded
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:00:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42567252.35d385f7.3153.3e2b@mx.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec22fc5050407235958a06990@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I think to solve your problem you could work around it by using a series of
awk grep and sed commands along with iptables -vL to test if your rule is
loaded, presently that is how i get my current ip etc..

man awk, man grep, man sed

for example:

EXTIP="`/sbin/ifconfig ppp0 | grep 'inet adr' | awk '{print $2}' | sed -e
's/.*$

Regards,

Tim

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org [mailto:netfilter-
> bounces@lists.netfilter.org] De la part de `VL
> Envoyé : vendredi 8 avril 2005 09:00
> À : netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Objet : Feature request: ability to test if rule is loaded
> 
> Hello all.
> 
> I recently started to configure my firewall and decided to write some
> more advanced shell scripts to make loading of rules easier. My task
> was to have a config which looks like:
> 
> loadrule client/ssh on/off
> loadrule server/sshd on/off
> 
> and i want the ability to run script, which will go thorough this list
> and will load rules that are not yet loaded, and remove rules, that
> marked off, if they are loaded.
> 
> client/ssh is a file, that contains something like this:
> 
> NAME="SSH Client"
> RULES_NUM="2"
> MY_SSH_SERVER1="xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx"
> 
> RULE[0]="OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp...."
> RULE[1]="INPUT -i eth0 ...."
> 
> When i want to add rule, my function loadrule runs iptables -A
> RULE[0,1...], if i want to disable rule, i call iptables -D
> RULE[0,1...]
> 
> But! How do i test if rule was loaded? If i delete rules, i get an
> error if rule is not loaded, if i add rules, it just added next in
> chain.
> 
> So, it would be nice to have new iptables option, i think -T , which
> will act like -D with one exception: it will not delete rule, just
> return true if rule exists in chain, and false otherwise.
> 
> It seems to me that it is very easy to add, and that it will be
> usefull for system administrators.
> 
> For example, if we can`t turn of firewall on critical server,
> administrator have to manually review list of rules and delete some,
> he decided to remove by some reasons. With my approach he just changes
> 1 line in readable config to off, and asks script to reload config.
> 
> What do you think ?



      reply	other threads:[~2005-04-08 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-08  6:59 Feature request: ability to test if rule is loaded `VL
2005-04-08 12:00 ` Timothy Earl [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42567252.35d385f7.3153.3e2b@mx.gmail.com \
    --to=mehimx@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox