From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: seberino@spawar.navy.mil
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: not sure ESTABLISHED TCP traffic will have ACK flag setalways...
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:09:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4258B523.9070902@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050410032308.GA20000@spawar.navy.mil>
> Grant
>
> Wow! Thanks again. You cleared up the last missing piece about ACKs!
> So the slow side can ACK multiple sequence numbers with a single
> packet. Likewise, the /fast/ side can send multiple ACKs for
> the same repetitive sequence number. That makes perfect sense.
>
> Now I believe that TCP packets can all have ACKs set on an
> ESTABLISHED connection.
>
> Chris
>
> P.S. BTW, I'm curious how you knew this level of great info. Did you
> carefully read through RFC 793? That was jam packed with info but
> hard to digest fully.
No, I cant say as I recall reading RFC 793 in particular, though I do read a LOT of RFC pertaining to what I do, I'm a systems administrator / consultant, so I need to know a lot about email (SMTP), DNS, www (HTTP), etc. I spend a lot of time helping others get their system up to speck thus I've run across a lot of not quite up to spec but close enough to work *most* of the time. I get called when it does not. If ever I run across things that I don't know about (and it happens more than you might think) I turn to RFC, Google (this is a REALLY BIG ONE), and peers in the industry on mail lists like this one. It's not what you know, it's who you know to ask. :)
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-10 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-08 15:57 not sure ESTABLISHED TCP traffic will have ACK flag set always Christian Seberino
2005-04-08 19:59 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-08 20:52 ` Michele Vetturi
2005-04-08 21:01 ` not sure ESTABLISHED TCP traffic will have ACK flag setalways Taylor, Grant
2005-04-09 6:24 ` seberino
2005-04-09 18:33 ` Grant Taylor
2005-04-10 3:23 ` seberino
2005-04-10 5:09 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2005-04-10 3:54 ` seberino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4258B523.9070902@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=seberino@spawar.navy.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox