Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Taylor, Grant" <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: hareram <hareram@sol.net.in>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Logging suggestions
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:33:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <425BEA65.5030203@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0aa401c53f73$5c19a2a0$09603fca@southern>

Oh, my, that will be tough.  Keep in mind that you will quite likely be generating more data doing the log than you will be having pass through your box, especially if the traffic has a small payload.  I would really be tempted to look at using TCPDump to dump everything to a file and then parse the file.  I don't think the LOG or ULOG target are designed for such high traffic volumes.  Even if they were, LOG logs to SYSLOG, which it in and of it's self is not meant for that high of a volume.  I've never messed with ULOG so I can't say.  Are you needing payload as well or just header information?  I still think TCPDump or some form of an IDS would be a better bet.  Try taking a look at Snort and see if that will come close to what you need.



Grant. . . .

hareram wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I have large  capacity link like STM with my provider
> Iam planning to log the every packet, source IP , Dest IP, Src port, 
> Dest port , Type of Service
> what kind of system configuration recommended
> 
> what kind of  logging system is better ?
> iam trying to use Ulogd and try to log every packet, but the kernel 
> crashes after 5min
> 
> i have Xeon 1GB ram with 40GB Scsi HDD running FC1
> 
> How can logging whole history of the packet with the better performance
> with out any payload to the user access, and transparently
> 
> any suggestions will be appreciated
> 
> hare
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-12 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-12 15:21 Logging suggestions hareram
2005-04-12 15:33 ` Taylor, Grant [this message]
2005-04-12 18:06   ` Moritz Gartenmeister
2005-04-12 16:11 ` Mariusz Kruk
2005-04-13  5:08   ` hareram
2005-04-13  6:58     ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-12 18:15 ` Marc Haber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=425BEA65.5030203@riverviewtech.net \
    --to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
    --cc=hareram@sol.net.in \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox