Re: SSH Brute force attacks

[Georgi Alexandrov <tehlists@hotpop.com>]

Jason Opperisano wrote:

>On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:30:16PM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
>  
>
>>Freaky.  My output is the same as yours with the exception of the 1.2.11
>>string.
>>
>>recent v1.2.11 options:
>><snip same stuff that you have>
>>ipt_recent v0.3.1: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>.
>>http://snowman.net/projects/ipt_recent/
>>
>>I'm a little confused about the difference between "recent v1.2.11" and
>>"ipt_recent v0.3.1"  Is one a kernel component and the other the
>>userspace part?
>>    
>>
>
>yes, ipt_recent == kernel module.  the 1.2.11 is the version of the
>iptables userspace utility.
>
>  
>
>>I'm also a little confused about p-o-m.  Is this something I can apply
>>without recompiling my (modular) kernel? 
>>    
>>
>
>no.
>  
>
I don't agree Jason. You can compile only the needed modules.
Here's a tutorial (in bulgarian sorry, but you can get the idea from the 
comments/commands) how to do that with fedora core 3:
http://hardtrance.blogspot.com/2005/04/fedora-core-3-patch-o-matic-ipttimeko.html

>  
>
>>Are there any good docs on how
>>to use p-o-m?  I didn't see any immediately obvious on the netfilter
>>site and the p-o-m section seems to end mid-
>>    
>>
>
>basic recipe:
>
>- download/extract kernel src
>- download/extract iptables src
>- download/extract p-o-m
>- apply patches from p-o-m
>- recompile kernel
>- recompile iptables
>- reboot, rinse, repeat.
>
>-j
>
>--
>"Stewie: Soooo Broccoli, mother says you're very good for me. But I'm
> afraid I'm no good for you."
>        --Family Guy
>
>
>  
>
regards,
Georgi Alexandrov