Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feizhou <feizhou@linuxmail.org>
To: /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: iptables leaking blocked ip addresses.
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:36:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42B7DF8D.3060304@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506201055.25861.rob0@gmx.co.uk>


> I do see that you've disabled CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK, which is a very 
> odd choice. Connection tracking is the strength of iptables!

You mean weakness.

netfilter's conntrack module sucks in performance and at the same time 
is not fully stateful.

If I wanted a stateful firewall, I would go for a OpenBSD solution.

For filtering to host, netfilter is ok without connection tracking.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-21  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-20 15:34 iptables leaking blocked ip addresses terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 15:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-20 16:01   ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 15:55 ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-20 16:00   ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-20 16:17   ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 16:59     ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-20 17:20       ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 18:29         ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-20 19:36           ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 20:19             ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-21 12:57             ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-21 13:10               ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21 13:13                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-21 13:39                   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21 18:05                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-22  7:10                       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-22 12:55                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-22 13:16                           ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-20 20:47           ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-21 12:17             ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-21 14:36               ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-21 14:57                 ` Joakim Axelsson
2005-06-20 18:50       ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-20 19:12         ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-20 19:30     ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2005-06-20 20:07       ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-20 20:23       ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 22:29         ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2005-06-20 23:04           ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-20 20:39       ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-21  7:11     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21  7:21       ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-21  7:56         ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21  8:24           ` terry l. ridder
2005-06-21  9:36   ` Feizhou [this message]
2005-06-21  9:40     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21 14:31     ` Cedric Blancher
2005-06-21 16:52       ` Feizhou
2005-06-21  3:24 ` Alistair Tonner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42B7DF8D.3060304@linuxmail.org \
    --to=feizhou@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=rob0@gmx.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox