Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk>
To: Netfilter ML <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: dnatting
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:38:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D2BCAF.4040906@gmx.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507111720230.26881@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>I have a rule on my friend's broadband connection to redirect traffic 
>>from outside to an internal machine like,
> 
>>iptables -A PREROUTING -d 1.2.3.4 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT  \
>>--to-destination 192.168.10.10:80
>>
>>But she complained that people from inside the network cannot do
>>http://1.2.3.4 in their browser and see the site. Is she correct?
>>What is wrong with my rule because I can see the site from outside?
> 
> The packet must pass the machine the DNAT rule is on to make the dnat 
> effective.

And then there should be a filter table rule to ACCEPT those packets, or 
at least nothing to DROP or otherwise not accept them.

With a typical (Packet-Filtering-HOWTO-inspired) firewall with default 
DROP policy in FORWARD, you need a corresponding ACCEPT rule in FORWARD 
for every DNAT. In crafting such rules remember that the destination has 
already been rewritten in nat/PREROUTING.

The Web proxy suggestion has me puzzled. :)
-- 
     mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
     or "not-spam" is in Subject: header


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-11 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-11 15:18 dnatting Payal Rathod
2005-07-11 15:20 ` dnatting Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-11 18:21   ` dnatting Payal Rathod
2005-07-11 18:38   ` /dev/rob0 [this message]
2005-07-11 18:42     ` dnatting Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-11 15:24 ` dnatting Scott
2005-07-11 18:45 ` dnatting Jason Opperisano
2005-07-11 18:54   ` dnatting Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-13  3:21   ` dnatting Donald Murray
2005-07-13  4:48     ` dnatting Jason Opperisano
2005-07-14 15:42 ` dnatting curby .
2005-07-14 15:49   ` dnatting curby .
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-11 19:09 dnatting Gary W. Smith
2005-07-12  7:34 ` dnatting Payal Rathod
2005-07-12 11:59   ` dnatting Jason Opperisano
2005-07-12 12:50     ` dnatting Payal Rathod
2005-07-12 21:03       ` dnatting Steven M Campbell
2005-07-12 14:05 dnatting Gary W. Smith
2005-07-12 23:19 dnatting Gary W. Smith
2005-07-13 10:39 ` dnatting Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-13 21:19   ` dnatting R. DuFresne
2005-07-13 14:50 ` dnatting Steven M Campbell
2005-07-13 16:33   ` dnatting Donald Murray
2005-07-13 16:39     ` dnatting Steven M Campbell
2005-07-13 16:28 dnatting Gary W. Smith
2005-07-13 16:40 ` dnatting Steven M Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42D2BCAF.4040906@gmx.co.uk \
    --to=rob0@gmx.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox