From: David Leangen <dleangen@canada.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Confirm: letting certain packages pass through un-natted
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:51:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4340B8DD.4070601@canada.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <433BDBE3.5010605@mnemon.de>
Hello!
>> +---------------+
>> | modem |
>> | (192.168.1.1) |
>> +---------------+
>> |
>> +-----------------+
>> | ppp0 |
>> | | |
>> | ...1.2 (eth0) |
>> | | |eth1
>> | ...2.1|-----192.168.2.0/24
>> | Firewall |
>> +-----------------+
>
> [SNIP]
>
>
>>Destination Gateway Genmask Iface
>>192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 eth0
>>192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 eth1
>>default xxx 0.0.0.0 ppp0
>
>
> [Rest snipped - probably not relevant]
>
> The only thing I can think of, is that pppd causes the problem.
> I think the following happens:
>
> 2.2 sends to 1.1
> Firewall receives on 2.1
> According to routing table firewall tries to send out on eth0
> But eth0 is now owned by pppd
> And pppd doesn't know about 1.1, he only knows about default
> gateway xxx
>
> As already said - this may be totally wrong (someone correct
> me please).
>
> I bet if you stop pppd, 2.2 can connect to 1.1 without any firewall
> rules (as long as the policies are ACCEPT and default gateway on 2.2
> points to 2.1). If this is true, the question is how to persuade
> pppd to deliver to 1.1. Sorry, I can't help you - may be
> somebody can jump in.
Hmmm... unfortunately, this does not seem to be the case...
I say this for two reasons:
1. I can still connect to 192.168.1.1 from 192.168.2.1
2. Even when I bring down ppp0, I still can't reach
192.168.1.1 from anywhere other than the machine
I mention in (1)
Unless, I didn't do the right thing. I simply did:
# ifconfig ppp0 down
Is this sufficient?
Thanks again!!
Dave
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-03 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-26 7:37 Confirm: letting certain packages pass through un-natted David Leangen
2005-09-26 7:51 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-09-27 0:17 ` David Leangen
2005-09-27 9:15 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-09-26 9:35 ` Mariusz Kruk
2005-09-26 22:44 ` David Leangen
2005-09-27 2:07 ` David Leangen
2005-09-27 8:55 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-09-29 4:43 ` David Leangen
[not found] ` <433BDBE3.5010605@mnemon.de>
2005-10-03 4:51 ` David Leangen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4340B8DD.4070601@canada.com \
--to=dleangen@canada.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox