Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Radek Hladik <rhladik@tfc.cz>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: IPset_iptree with timeouts on Fedora Core 4
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:57:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4361776C.5070706@tfc.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510272129210.2649@blackhole.kfki.hu>

Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:

>>Oct 27 02:42:58 radek kernel: Debug: sleeping function called from
>>invalid context at mm/slab.c:2126
>>    
>>
>
>Sigh. It seems I was capable to commit all possible stupid mistakes in
>iptree. Your fix is correct, expect a new release tomorrow.
>  
>

Thanks a lot.

>  
>
>>But iptree still had not members removed after specified timeout. I have
>>"discovered" (after reading the source code)  that the iptree set need
>>to have set the default timeout value (with --timeout option). Is this
>>true or am I doing something wrong?
>>    
>>
>
>That is a feature. Originally iptree did not support the timeout of the
>entries. In order to keep backward compatibility, the default (i.e no
>timeout) is preserved.
>  
>
I'm afraid I wrote it a little bit confusing :(
What I mean is that when I create iptree without default timeout:

ipset -N test iptree

and now I try to add member with timeout:

ipset -A test 1.2.3.4%60

but the timeout is not working and IP 1.2.3.4 stays in the iptree 
forever. According to log messages:
kernel: net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_set_iptree.c: ip_tree_gc (DBG): gc: 1 2 3 
4: expires 1 jiffies 9992264
The garbage collector is called but expires value is set to 1. I think 
that it is because of the line
ipt_set_iptree.c:141    dtree->expires[d] = map->timeout ? (timeout * HZ 
+ jiffies) : 1;
which sets expires to 1 when adding member with timeout to non-timeout 
iptree. I think it would not break backward compatibility as old 
commands do not use the ip%timeout notation.

And I've found another issue I want to ask about. Is there any 
possibility to set timeout different from default timeout via ipt_SET 
target?


Radek




  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-28  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-27  2:56 IPset_iptree with timeouts on Fedora Core 4 Radek Hladik
2005-10-27 19:34 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-10-28  0:57   ` Radek Hladik [this message]
2005-10-28 13:24     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4361776C.5070706@tfc.cz \
    --to=rhladik@tfc.cz \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox