From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <ashley@pcraft.com>
To: Rob Sterenborg <rob@sterenborg.info>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Re: iptables problem
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:45:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4369B1F2.50804@pcraft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051103062533.C48C96AA57@smtp.sterenborg.info>
>Maybe you can let the kiosk hosts connect to the server and perform GET
>and PUT commands. The server then only has to put the needed updates in
>a specific directory where the kiosk hosts can download them from. This
>way the hosts themselves don't have to be reachable on the internet
>which would be better from a security point of view.
>
>
Thanks for the explanation Rob.
I can't control what happens on the serverside. That's a third
party company. I figured regardless of me being able to forward port 21
to one of these machines without a problem, I can't do it for all
three. So I think I'm screwed either way. Grrr...
--
H | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@pcraft.com> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Imaging . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-03 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-01 18:06 iptables problem Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-02 0:31 ` Buddy wu
2005-11-02 1:29 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-02 1:37 ` Buddy wu
2005-11-02 5:56 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-02 7:20 ` Nikolai Georgiev
2005-11-02 8:01 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-02 22:49 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-03 6:19 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-03 6:45 ` Ashley M. Kirchner [this message]
2005-11-03 15:21 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) Jim Laurino
2005-11-03 16:02 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-03 16:23 ` Sven Schuster
2005-11-03 17:17 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusivesender " Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-03 17:00 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusive (nfcan: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) sender " Jim Laurino
2005-11-03 19:57 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-04 5:00 ` Re: iptables problem (nfcan: addressed to exclusive (nfcan: addressed to exclusive sender for this address) " Jim Laurino
2005-11-04 5:06 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-04 6:04 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-11-03 21:54 ` Re: iptables problem R. DuFresne
2005-11-04 0:51 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
2005-11-04 3:18 ` R. DuFresne
2005-11-04 4:26 ` Ashley M. Kirchner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4369B1F2.50804@pcraft.com \
--to=ashley@pcraft.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=rob@sterenborg.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox