From: Daniel Ivanov <sertys@supportivo.org>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: I'm facing a simple 2-way decision.
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 06:59:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <439FA6AF.3060902@supportivo.org> (raw)
My choice is between ipt_CLASSIFY and ipt_MARK . I've modified both in a
way, so they return NF_ACCEPT as a verdict, when a special knob is
placed and am "identifying" my client connections and thus getting them
into the right class.
However, i thought CLASSIFY would be way too faster than MARK, because i
don't have e filter in tc thus. But that just ain't the case.
Is ipt_CLASSIFY slower than ipt_MARK in terms of getting the packets
into the right queue class?
reply other threads:[~2005-12-14 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=439FA6AF.3060902@supportivo.org \
--to=sertys@supportivo.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox