From: "Samuel Díaz García" <samueldg@arcoscom.com>
To: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: "condition" patch for kernel 2.6
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 23:10:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43B8533E.6050901@arcoscom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509261500.55328@nienna>
Don't need any patch for iptables?
Thanks
KOVACS Krisztian escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 26 September 2005 13.39, afshin lamei wrote:
>
>>dear all,
>>1- I want to use the "condition" patch in kernel 2.6.x, I remember
>>that it was available only for kernel 2.4.x. Is it available now for
>>2.6?
>
>
> Yes, I've attached it. Unofficial, not supported, etc. I've used it
> with 2.6.11.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: linux-2.6.11-ipsec/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_condition.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.11-ipsec/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_condition.c 2005-03-03 15:17:53.826807876 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
> +/*-------------------------------------------*\
> +| Netfilter Condition Module |
> +| |
> +| Description: This module allows firewall |
> +| rules to match using condition variables |
> +| stored in /proc files. |
> +| |
> +| Author: Stephane Ouellette 2002-10-22 |
> +| <ouellettes@videotron.ca> |
> +| |
> +| History: |
> +| 2003-02-10 Second version with improved |
> +| locking and simplified code. |
> +| |
> +| This software is distributed under the |
> +| terms of the GNU GPL. |
> +\*-------------------------------------------*/
> +
> +#include<linux/module.h>
> +#include<linux/proc_fs.h>
> +#include<linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include<linux/string.h>
> +#include<asm/atomic.h>
> +#include<linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h>
> +#include<linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_condition.h>
> +
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +#error "Proc file system support is required for this module"
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Stephane Ouellette <ouellettes@videotron.ca>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Allows rules to match against condition variables");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +
> +
> +struct condition_variable {
> + struct condition_variable *next;
> + struct proc_dir_entry *status_proc;
> + atomic_t refcount;
> + int enabled; /* TRUE == 1, FALSE == 0 */
> +};
> +
> +
> +static rwlock_t list_lock;
> +static struct condition_variable *head = NULL;
> +static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_net_condition = NULL;
> +
> +
> +static int
> +ipt_condition_read_info(char *buffer, char **start, off_t offset,
> + int length, int *eof, void *data)
> +{
> + struct condition_variable *var =
> + (struct condition_variable *) data;
> +
> + if (offset == 0) {
> + *start = buffer;
> + buffer[0] = (var->enabled) ? '1' : '0';
> + buffer[1] = '\n';
> + return 2;
> + }
> +
> + *eof = 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int
> +ipt_condition_write_info(struct file *file, const char *buffer,
> + unsigned long length, void *data)
> +{
> + struct condition_variable *var =
> + (struct condition_variable *) data;
> +
> + if (length) {
> + /* Match only on the first character */
> + switch (buffer[0]) {
> + case '0':
> + var->enabled = 0;
> + break;
> + case '1':
> + var->enabled = 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return (int) length;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int
> +match(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const struct net_device *in,
> + const struct net_device *out,
> + const void *matchinfo,
> + int offset,
> + int *hotdrop)
> +{
> + const struct condition_info *info =
> + (const struct condition_info *) matchinfo;
> + struct condition_variable *var;
> + int condition_status = 0;
> +
> + read_lock(&list_lock);
> +
> + for (var = head; var; var = var->next) {
> + if (strcmp(info->name, var->status_proc->name) == 0) {
> + condition_status = var->enabled;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + read_unlock(&list_lock);
> +
> + return condition_status ^ info->invert;
> +}
> +
> +
> +
> +static int
> +checkentry(const char *tablename, const struct ipt_ip *ip,
> + void *matchinfo, unsigned int matchsize, unsigned int hook_mask)
> +{
> + struct condition_info *info = (struct condition_info *) matchinfo;
> + struct condition_variable *var, *newvar;
> +
> + if (matchsize != IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct condition_info)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* The first step is to check if the condition variable already exists. */
> + /* Here, a read lock is sufficient because we won't change the list */
> + read_lock(&list_lock);
> +
> + for (var = head; var; var = var->next) {
> + if (strcmp(info->name, var->status_proc->name) == 0) {
> + atomic_inc(&var->refcount);
> + read_unlock(&list_lock);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + read_unlock(&list_lock);
> +
> + /* At this point, we need to allocate a new condition variable */
> + newvar = kmalloc(sizeof(struct condition_variable), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!newvar)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Create the condition variable's proc file entry */
> + newvar->status_proc = create_proc_entry(info->name, 0644, proc_net_condition);
> +
> + if (!newvar->status_proc) {
> + /*
> + * There are two possibilities:
> + * 1- Another condition variable with the same name has been created, which is valid.
> + * 2- There was a memory allocation error.
> + */
> + kfree(newvar);
> + read_lock(&list_lock);
> +
> + for (var = head; var; var = var->next) {
> + if (strcmp(info->name, var->status_proc->name) == 0) {
> + atomic_inc(&var->refcount);
> + read_unlock(&list_lock);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + read_unlock(&list_lock);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + atomic_set(&newvar->refcount, 1);
> + newvar->enabled = 0;
> + newvar->status_proc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + newvar->status_proc->data = newvar;
> + wmb();
> + newvar->status_proc->read_proc = ipt_condition_read_info;
> + newvar->status_proc->write_proc = ipt_condition_write_info;
> +
> + write_lock(&list_lock);
> +
> + newvar->next = head;
> + head = newvar;
> +
> + write_unlock(&list_lock);
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void
> +destroy(void *matchinfo, unsigned int matchsize)
> +{
> + struct condition_info *info = (struct condition_info *) matchinfo;
> + struct condition_variable *var, *prev = NULL;
> +
> + if (matchsize != IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct condition_info)))
> + return;
> +
> + write_lock(&list_lock);
> +
> + for (var = head; var && strcmp(info->name, var->status_proc->name);
> + prev = var, var = var->next);
> +
> + if (var && atomic_dec_and_test(&var->refcount)) {
> + if (prev)
> + prev->next = var->next;
> + else
> + head = var->next;
> +
> + write_unlock(&list_lock);
> + remove_proc_entry(var->status_proc->name, proc_net_condition);
> + kfree(var);
> + } else
> + write_unlock(&list_lock);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static struct ipt_match condition_match = {
> + .name = "condition",
> + .match = &match,
> + .checkentry = &checkentry,
> + .destroy = &destroy,
> + .me = THIS_MODULE
> +};
> +
> +
> +static int __init
> +init(void)
> +{
> + int errorcode;
> +
> + rwlock_init(&list_lock);
> + proc_net_condition = proc_mkdir("ipt_condition", proc_net);
> +
> + if (proc_net_condition) {
> + errorcode = ipt_register_match(&condition_match);
> +
> + if (errorcode)
> + remove_proc_entry("ipt_condition", proc_net);
> + } else
> + errorcode = -EACCES;
> +
> + return errorcode;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void __exit
> +fini(void)
> +{
> + ipt_unregister_match(&condition_match);
> + remove_proc_entry("ipt_condition", proc_net);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(init);
> +module_exit(fini);
> Index: linux-2.6.11-ipsec/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.11-ipsec.orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile 2005-03-03 15:17:50.724537092 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-ipsec/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile 2005-03-03 15:17:53.826807876 +0100
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_PHYSDEV) += ipt_physdev.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_COMMENT) += ipt_comment.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_U32) += ipt_u32.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_CONDITION) += ipt_condition.o
>
> # targets
> obj-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT) += ipt_REJECT.o
> Index: linux-2.6.11-ipsec/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_condition.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.11-ipsec/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_condition.h 2005-03-03 15:17:53.827807641 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#ifndef __IPT_CONDITION_MATCH__
> +#define __IPT_CONDITION_MATCH__
> +
> +#define CONDITION_NAME_LEN 32
> +
> +struct condition_info {
> + char name[CONDITION_NAME_LEN];
> + int invert;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> Index: linux-2.6.11-ipsec/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.11-ipsec.orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig 2005-03-03 15:17:50.725536857 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-ipsec/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig 2005-03-03 15:17:53.828807406 +0100
> @@ -388,6 +388,16 @@
>
> Details and examples are in the kernel module source.
>
> +config IP_NF_MATCH_CONDITION
> + tristate 'condition match support'
> + depends on IP_NF_IPTABLES
> + help
> + This option allows you to match firewall rules against condition
> + variables stored in the /proc/net/ipt_condition directory.
> +
> + If you want to compile it as a module, say M here and read
> + Documentation/modules.txt. If unsure, say `N'.
> +
> # `filter', generic and specific targets
> config IP_NF_FILTER
> tristate "Packet filtering"
--
Samuel Díaz García
Director Gerente
ArcosCom Wireless, S.L.L.
CIF: B11828068
c/ Romero Gago, 19
Arcos de la Frontera
11630 - Cadiz
http://www.arcoscom.com
mailto:samueldg@arcoscom.com
msn: samueldg@arcoscom.com
Móvil: 651 93 72 48
Tlfn.: 956 70 13 15
Fax: 956 70 34 83
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-01 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-26 11:39 "condition" patch for kernel 2.6 afshin lamei
2005-09-26 13:00 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2006-01-01 22:10 ` Samuel Díaz García [this message]
2006-01-02 10:26 ` KOVACS Krisztian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43B8533E.6050901@arcoscom.com \
--to=samueldg@arcoscom.com \
--cc=hidden@balabit.hu \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox