From: "Samuel Díaz García" <samueldg@arcoscom.com>
To: Mac!eKs <macieks@freesco.pl>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Where is CONNMARK extension kernel 2.4.32?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C4B1A4.3070706@arcoscom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43C4003B.9080400@freesco.pl>
The last pom-ng tested by me where the 20051231 and I'm sure the
CONNMARK isn't into it.
Could any netfilter guy re-add these patches into pom-ng for the 2.4
kernels? Or, better, talk with kernel guys to add them into 2.4 mainline?
What do you think about this propose?
Regards
Mac!eKs escribió:
> Samuel Díaz García napisał(a):
>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I have troubles with CONNMARK extensions into kernel 2.4.32.
>>>
>>> The problem I have is that I tried to patch a 2.4.32 kernel with
>>> pom-ng and I cant see CONNMARK extension into the pom-ng options and
>>> isn't in kernel config.
>>>
>>> Perhaps could be that any patch I applied before (IMQ, Layer7filter,
>>> etc...) had broken it. I had compiled kernel, iptables (1.3.4) and
>>> many pom-ng patches. And when I test some scripts that uses CONNMARK
>>> without success (chain/tarjet error).
>>> I can view /usr/local/usr/libipt_CONNMARK.so and I suppose that is
>>> the reason why I can view "iptables -j CONNMARK --help" help text,
>>> but I can't see any "/lib/modules/2.4.32/....." *CONNMARK* module and
>>> isn't compiled into the kernel (cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep
>>> "CONNMARK") doesn't show me anythink.
>>>
>>> Can anybody help me please?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>
> which pom-ng snapshot are you using?
> The last pom-ng snapshot with CONNMARK/TTL/string is from 20050918.
> Then these patches were removed, because they are now in 2.6 kernel
> serie. But not in 2.4 :/
>
--
Samuel Díaz García
Director Gerente
ArcosCom Wireless, S.L.L.
CIF: B11828068
c/ Romero Gago, 19
Arcos de la Frontera
11630 - Cadiz
http://www.arcoscom.com
mailto:samueldg@arcoscom.com
msn: samueldg@arcoscom.com
Móvil: 651 93 72 48
Tlfn.: 956 70 13 15
Fax: 956 70 34 83
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-11 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-08 11:23 Where is CONNMARK extension kernel 2.4.32? Samuel Díaz García
2006-01-09 17:58 ` Samuel Díaz García
2006-01-10 18:43 ` Mac!eKs
2006-01-11 7:20 ` Samuel Díaz García [this message]
2006-01-11 10:59 ` Mac!eKs
2006-02-09 15:30 ` Samuel Díaz García
2006-01-09 18:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C4B1A4.3070706@arcoscom.com \
--to=samueldg@arcoscom.com \
--cc=macieks@freesco.pl \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox