From: Chinh Nguyen <cnguyen@certicom.com>
To: Daniel Nogradi <nogradi@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: updated iptables doesn't work with old rules
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:54:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FCCF82.6010402@certicom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f56302b0602221253t7157857ejb15f87d9984da59c@mail.gmail.com>
Daniel Nogradi wrote:
> Anyway, what I have tried is:
>
> # make sure we start from zero
>
> iptables --flush
> iptables -t nat --flush
> iptables --delete-chain
> iptables -t nat --delete-chain
>
> # set up masquerading from LAN to modem which is hook up on eth0
>
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING --out-interface eth0 -j MASQUERADE
>
> # allow forwarding from LAN which is hookup up on eth1
>
> iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth1 -j ACCEPT
I think that when you have a rule like this, you need the converse. ie,
iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT
If you want restrictions such that connections are initiated from B only, you
could restrict the inbound forward.
iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
>
> # enable ip forwarding
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding
>
> Just to recap, my configuration is this:
>
> machine A - eth0 ------------------ modem ------------ internet
> |
> eth1
> |
> |
> |
> hub
> |
> |
> machine B
>
> And I would like to access the internet from machine B, however the
> above rules don't work even without specifying the sources and
> allowing everything.
>
> Any ideas?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-22 9:58 updated iptables doesn't work with old rules Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-22 11:01 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-02-22 11:25 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-22 12:35 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-02-22 13:39 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-22 20:53 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-22 20:54 ` Chinh Nguyen [this message]
2006-02-22 21:57 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-22 22:18 ` Chinh Nguyen
2006-02-22 23:13 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-22 23:25 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-23 14:42 ` Chinh Nguyen
2006-02-23 15:49 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-24 0:41 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-24 6:26 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-02-24 10:14 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-24 12:22 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-02-24 14:48 ` Chinh Nguyen
2006-02-24 23:17 ` Daniel Nogradi
2006-02-25 19:20 ` Rob Sterenborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43FCCF82.6010402@certicom.com \
--to=cnguyen@certicom.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=nogradi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox