Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anders Peter Fugmann <afu@fugmann.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Connection tracking and REJECT target.
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:10:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FCD33F.2040502@fugmann.net> (raw)

Hi,

I'm seeing some strange classification by the connection tracking system
of packets being generated by the REJECT target.

Consider the following rules:

iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state RELATED -p tcp --sport 113 -j LOG
--log-prefix "RELATED:"
iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED -p tcp --sport 113 -j
LOG --log-prefix "ESTABLISHED:"

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 113 -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset

Marks the ACK,RST packet generated to reset the TCP connection as related:

Feb 22 22:01:14 localhost kernel: RELATED:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=10.0.0.2
DST=10.0.0.254 LEN=40 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=113 DPT=51889 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 ACK RST URGP=0

I have no ident daemon running on the machine. Removing the reject rule
from the INPUT chain, makes the ACK,RST packet being marks as RELATED
as expected:

Feb 22 22:01:26 localhost kernel: ESTABLISHED:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=10.0.0.2
DST=10.0.0.254 LEN=40 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=20 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=113 DPT=51891 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 ACK RST URGP=0

Is this intended behaviour? Are RST,SYN packets (or any other packet
generated by a REJECT rule) automatically marked as RELATED by design?

The problem is observed on Linux 2.6.15 and 2.6.16-rc4.

Regards
Anders Fugmann



             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-22 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-22 21:10 Anders Peter Fugmann [this message]
2006-02-23  0:39 ` Connection tracking and REJECT target Philip Craig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43FCD33F.2040502@fugmann.net \
    --to=afu@fugmann.net \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox