From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vherva@vianova.fi, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc1: /sbin/iptables does not find kernel netfilter
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:37:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4439385B.6010908@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87psjqg2nt.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Nix wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2006, Ville Herva yowled:
>
>>On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 05:44:16PM +0300, you [Ville Herva] wrote:
>>
>>>I just realized
>>># CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE is not set
>>>should probably be set. I'm building a new kernel now...
>>
>>Ok, that seems to do it.
>>
>>Thanks for the help, and sorry for the noise. I hope not too many people hit
>>the same glitch while upgrading...
>
>
> I cetainly did. A simple `make oldconfig' ends up zapping pretty much
> all the old iptables CONFIG_ options, so you end up with not much of
> iptables or netfilter left.
But it does show you all the new options. Admittedly, it would
have been better to automatically select the new options when
needed, but probably not worth changing it now, it has been
like this for two releases I think.
> I must admit not quite understanding why the xtables stuff is needed:
> I thought that was needed for userspace connection tracking, which
> while it sounds cool isn't something I'm using yet.
Its a unification of the matches and targets that are address family
independant.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-09 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604022037380.3781@g5.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20060408200915.GN1686@vianova.fi>
[not found] ` <44388908.6070602@trash.net>
2006-04-09 7:43 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc1: /sbin/iptables does not find kernel netfilter Ville Herva
2006-04-09 14:44 ` Ville Herva
2006-04-09 14:45 ` Ville Herva
2006-04-09 16:00 ` Nix
2006-04-09 16:23 ` Andre Tomt
2006-04-11 11:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-09 16:37 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-04-09 16:53 ` Nix
2006-04-09 17:10 ` Ville Herva
2006-04-11 9:03 ` Harald Welte
2006-04-11 19:10 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4439385B.6010908@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=vherva@vianova.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox