From: Andrew Beverley <andy@andybev.com>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <olenf@ans.pl>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, martin.bene@icomedias.com,
kraxel@bytesex.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Connlimit and linux-2.6.17
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:34:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C1F127.5040704@andybev.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607220227500.2260@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Andrew Beverley wrote:
>
>>>>>> I (and others, see netfilter list) are having trouble compiling
>>>>>> kernel 2.6.17.4 and iptables-1.3.5-20060508 to use connlimit. Once
>>>>>> compiled in and I run:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the API was changed in 2.6.17, so small fixes are required to
>>>>> allow extensions to work. I'm currently traveling a lot so
>>>>> connlimit & TARPIT is still on my TODO list. I'm going to finish it
>>>>> ASAP but with limited GPRS/EDGE access it is not so simple.
>>>
>>> OK, I fixed the connlimit extension. Please:
>>>
>>> - tell me if it works (or not).
>>>
>>
>> I forgot to mention - I get a lot of 'ipt_connlimit: Oops: invalid ct
>> state' error messages scrolling up the screen.
>
> But when did it start? In 2.6.17?
Sorry - should have said. It has always done it. I thought I'd take the
opportunity to ask as I've never found the answer.
>
>> Is it safe for me to edit ipt_connlimit.c to not print them? Or are
>> they telling me there is something wrong with my setup?
>
> Plase try adding "-m conntrack --ctstate INVALID -j DROP" before "-m
> connlimit (...)". Did it help?
Yes, that sorts it. I have a lot of clients on my network and these look like
they're generated by some p2p software of one PC.
Many thanks,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-22 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <44BEA42B.3000304@andybev.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607200026310.4015@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
2006-07-19 22:45 ` Connlimit and linux-2.6.17 Andrew Beverley
2006-07-21 20:06 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-07-21 20:23 ` Andrew Beverley
2006-07-21 20:32 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-07-21 23:30 ` Andrew Beverley
2006-07-22 0:10 ` Andrew Beverley
2006-07-22 0:37 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-07-22 9:34 ` Andrew Beverley [this message]
2006-07-19 15:13 Adlan
2006-07-19 21:21 ` Andrew Beverley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-16 21:53 Andrew Beverley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C1F127.5040704@andybev.com \
--to=andy@andybev.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=martin.bene@icomedias.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=olenf@ans.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox