From: Florent Guiliani <fguiliani@perinfo.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: tun99 not trapped by tun+
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:26:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F3FA24.2070004@perinfo.com> (raw)
I've about 30 VPN with vtun who use tunXX interfaces (from tun0 to
tun40). I've
others VPN with OpenVPN but all is using only one interface: tun99.
For some strange reasons a rule who match in:tun+/out:any doesn't match
packets from tun99.
Any Idea?
Florent,
reply other threads:[~2006-08-29 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F3FA24.2070004@perinfo.com \
--to=fguiliani@perinfo.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox