From: Lucas Diaz <lucasdiaz@eternet.cc>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Marks set in PREROUTING got lost
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:17:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451BBD3D.40305@eternet.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451B9794.9090209@gmx.de>
So, something marked with -j MARK can't be matched on nat table, right?
What if after you mark the packet with -j MARK, you do "-m mark --mark X
-j CONNMARK --save-mark"; it should be visible from nat table or must be
marked with -j CONNMARK --set-mark?
>> What marks, per-packet marks or per-connection marks?
>>
>I am not sure, how to distinguish, I just mark all pakets that pass
-j MARK => per-packet
-j CONNMARK => per-connection
>through a certain user defined chain. I guess this is a mark per packet.
>The particular chain lookes like this:
>
>
>Chain FWD_WWW-101 (2 references)
>target prot opt source destination
>ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 quota:
>100000000 bytes
>MARK all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK
>set 0x65
>ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 quota:
>1000000 bytes
>MARK all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK
>set 0x1
MARK is only allowed in the mangle table.
>
>
>The goal is to provide full network speed for all NATed computers
>for a certain amount of bytes (first quota match), then mark their
>packets individually (each computer has its own mangle chain
>(FWD_WWW-$computernumber)) with its computernumber in hex, so tc can
>slow down their connection to 56k and after the "slow quota" is used
>up, the users packets get a different mark (mark 1) and get a DNAT
>to an Over Quota webpage, when the user tries to access an outside
>webpage, other connectionattempts get droped.
>
>
>The problem is now, that pakets get marked with the mark 0x1, but in
>PREROUTING nat table, this mark never appears.
http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow.png
PREROUTING comes before FORWARD.
>
>Thanks, Clemens
>
>
Jan Engelhardt
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-28 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-27 23:50 Marks set in PREROUTING got lost Clemens
2006-09-28 8:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-28 9:36 ` Clemens
2006-09-28 10:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-28 16:06 ` Clemens
2006-09-28 12:17 ` Lucas Diaz [this message]
2006-09-28 12:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-28 16:05 ` Clemens
2006-09-29 6:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
[not found] ` <359510883.21717@mail.nankai.edu.cn>
[not found] ` <451E0EDF.2050901@mail.nankai.edu.cn>
2006-09-30 6:29 ` Bo Yang
[not found] <359401435.12133@mail.nankai.edu.cn>
[not found] ` <451CA4A8.5080402@mail.nankai.edu.cn>
2006-09-29 4:44 ` Bo Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=451BBD3D.40305@eternet.cc \
--to=lucasdiaz@eternet.cc \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox