From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Passive FTP sees remote's _internal_ IP!!??
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:26:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <456B57FA.5020000@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061127184454.0BD73DB@brinstar.nerim.net>
Hello,
Maxime Ducharme a écrit :
> This happens when the remote server has a bad
> NAT configuration for FTP.
I fully agree, the problem seems to be on the server side.
> Maybe SonicWALL is able to "fix" this itself, I dont
> know this product very well.
If it does so, I'd be happy to know how.
> some suggestions :
>
> 1. Fix NAT for FTP on remote firewall
>
> 2. Configure remote server to explicitly send
> external IP for passive connections (most of FTP
> software allows to configure this)
>
> 3. Configure your FTP client to use active mode.
> If server is running on another port than 21,
> you must tell ip_nat_ftp to "listen" for FTP
> traffic on this port. Someone on this list can
> tell us how ? (I dont remember how)
$ modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp ports=21,alternate_port
$ modprobe ip_nat_ftp ports=21,alternate_port
Both commands are needed because AFAIK, ip_nat_ftp loads automatically
ip_conntrack_ftp if not already loaded but does not pass the port list
to it. Duh.
3b. Use extended passive mode (EPSV) if the client, the remote server
and their firewall/NATs support it, because an EPSV reply does not
contains the server address.
[Read on]
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
> [mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] De la part de gypsy
> Envoyé : 27 novembre, 2006 10:33
> À : netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Objet : Passive FTP sees remote's _internal_ IP!!??
>
> We don't think this is a netfilter problem.
I agree, at least not on the client side.
> The kernel should tell the
> remote end that it can't use the "nonroutable" IP - shouldn't it?
No, the kernel is not supposed to do this. All the Netfilter FTP NAT
helper module can do is translate "internal" addresses. However the
wrong PASV reply comes from the outside.
>>>When the default GW is set to the linux box (192.168.223.254) and
>>>passive FTP to a remote server is initiated, the FTP fails after
>>>connection because the internal IP of the remote machine (192.168.1.11)
>>>is seen rather than its external IP. This problem occurs only when
>>>passive FTP is used.
Does this happen with any FTP server or only a specific one ?
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-27 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061127184454.0BD73DB@brinstar.nerim.net>
2006-11-27 21:26 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2006-11-28 4:46 ` Passive FTP sees remote's _internal_ IP!!?? gypsy
2006-11-28 18:09 ` Maxime Ducharme
2006-11-28 22:36 ` Pascal Hambourg
2006-11-28 9:14 ` gypsy
2006-11-27 15:32 gypsy
2006-11-27 15:37 ` David Sims
2006-11-27 18:39 ` Maxime Ducharme
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-26 9:01 gypsy
2006-11-26 20:18 ` William Lima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=456B57FA.5020000@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox