From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJ0xatyYXMgxaBsYWp1cw==?= Subject: How to hide a NAT router? Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4575E11B.4060007@arturaz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hello, I've stepped on this mail in list: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/2004-November/056947.html But I still haven't found any solutions for these two problems: the second method, sterilizing IP header information and stripping unneeded TCP flags would successfully undermine this scheme. For the last Method, counting hosts behind a router. Striping the fragmentation flag for syn packets, and setting the IP ID to '0', (like Linux and Free BSD both do) would make it impossible to count hosts behind a NAT router. Any ideas how to do that on 2.6 and latest netfilter? -- Pagarbiai, Artūras Šlajus -- Skype: arturaz_ ICQ: 157929934 Jabber: arturaz@akl.lt IRC: arturaz @ irc.data.lt, irc.freenode.net, irc.lcirc.net