From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Subject: Re: Multihoming problem Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:52:08 +0530 Message-ID: <45766190.8040607@hostway.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Javier A Toledano Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi, Well, I have done this ! What does route -n say ? You would just need one iptable rule for masquerading outgoing requests through eth1. Do you have anything else ? At 10.0.0.X host, do route -n : [ from where you are not able to ping to 192.168.0.X ] - Danny Javier A Toledano wrote: > Hello To everyone: > > I've setup a linux box with 3 ethernet cards. > One in the 10.0.0.0/8 net in the eth0, > the other in the 192.168.10.0/24 in the eth2 and > the other is connected to dsl modemwith with eth1. > > I've setup forwarding with, net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1. > A strange phenomenon happens that I don't understantd. When I make an > echo request from a host in the net 10.0.0.0 to a host in the > 192.168.10.0 the packet arrives to the eth0 interface but it seems > that it doesn't traverse the linux because with tcpdump I see no icmp > packet in eth2 > But when a make an echo request from the 192.168.10.0 to a host in > 10.0.0.0 , I receive the echo reply and, inmediatley the echo request > originated in 10.0.0.0 receives the echo replies from 192.168.10.0. > > If would appreciate any idea, Sorry for my poor English. > > Thanks in advance > >