From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: problem with (incorrectly?) INVALID packets
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:48:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45837AA1.6030508@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612151134.35827.mike@v6.gaima.co.uk>
On 12/15/06 05:34, Mike Williams wrote:
<really big snip>
> Routing table now:
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 90.1...1.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.131.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond1
> 192.168.22.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond3
> 192.168.0.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.30.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
> 192.168.136.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond2
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 90.1...1.69 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 bond0
>
> Routing table previously:
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 90.1...1.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.131.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond1
> 192.168.22.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond3
> 192.168.0.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.30.0 90.1...1.69 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
> 192.168.136.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond2
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 90.1...1.69 0.0.0.0 UG 1000 0 0 br0
Sorry, if I have missed it, but which system are these routing tables
from? Bridge or LFW?
> # uname -r
> 2.6.17-hardened-r1
> # zgrep BRIDGE_NETFILTER /proc/config.gz
> CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y
This means that you will be able to use IPTables to filter your bridged
traffic. Which as I think about it, with out seeing your full IPTables
rule set, may be the reason some of your packets are having their state
incorrectly identified. Can we see a full iptables-save output?
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-16 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-12 19:42 problem with (incorrectly?) INVALID packets Mike Williams
2006-12-13 3:11 ` Grant Taylor
2006-12-13 12:39 ` Mike Williams
2006-12-13 23:27 ` Grant Taylor
2006-12-15 11:34 ` Mike Williams
2006-12-16 4:48 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2006-12-15 9:15 ` Mike Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45837AA1.6030508@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox