Re: a whitelist for outgoing syn port 80, 443 traffic for hosting

[franck <joncourt_franck@yahoo.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ken A wrote:
>>>> Is anyone aware of a whitelist of hostnames of port 80,443 OUTGOING
>>>> traffic that should be considered 'normal' in a hosting environment?
>>>> ie: SYN traffic to ups.com, authorize.net, technorati, for ecommerce,
>>>> blogging, etc..
>>>>
>>>> Categorizing traffic as good/bad is useful in this day of many php
>>>> remote file include bugs.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
> 
> Maybe this is what you are looking for :
> 
> http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/zero/
> 
>> Thanks, but I'm looking for a whitelist for a fairly wide range of web
>> applications, not a blacklist. There are plenty of good blacklists out
>> there. surbl.org, uribl.com , etc. :-)
>> Ken


As a matter of fact, I thought something you can put in a blacklist
could be useful, because it cannot be in the whitelist you are looking
for. But, thinking about it again, it is quite clear I would prefer a
small whitelist rather than a very huge blacklist.

Sorry.

- --
Franck Joncourt
http://www.debian.org
http://smhteam.info/wiki/
GPG server : pgpkeys.mit.edu
Fingerprint : C10E D1D0 EF70 0A2A CACF  9A3C C490 534E 75C0 89FE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFyjVqxJBTTnXAif4RAoNBAKDD3HkFIrXh0ibViKiJnuu7l2UQAwCffV1A
tCuQUzJbHAeWcQA6vIoyWqM=
=srtS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

		
___________________________________________________________ 
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html