Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gáspár Lajos" <swifty@freemail.hu>
To: Petr Pisar <xpisar@fi.muni.cz>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Policy targets...
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:13:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4651C50D.7080605@freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrnf4j5ek.ic3.xpisar@album.ics.muni.cz>

Hi!

Petr Pisar írta:
> On 2007-05-11, G?sp?r Lajos <swifty@freemail.hu> wrote:
>   
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was reading the iptables manual because I needed the correct arguments 
>> of the policy (-P) command.
>> Here it is:
>>
>>        -P, --policy chain target
>>               Set the policy for the chain to the given target.  See the 
>> section TARGETS for the legal targets.  Only built-in (non-user-defined) 
>> chains can
>>               have policies, and neither built-in nor user-defined 
>> chains can be policy targets.
>>
>> So I checked the TARGETS.
>>
>> TARGETS
>>        A  firewall rule specifies criteria for a packet, and a target.  
>> If the packet does not match, the next rule in the chain is the 
>> examined; if it does
>>        match, then the next rule is specified by the value of the 
>> target, which can be the name of a user-defined chain or one of the 
>> special values ACCEPT,
>>        DROP, QUEUE, or RETURN.
>>
>> My question is: What is the difference between the ACCEPT and the RETURN 
>> target in policy ??? :D
>>
>>     
> I think this is missunderstadning in man page. If you read the TARGETS
> section carefully you could see here is nothing about policy even if -P
> paragraph referres to it.
>   
Okay. That is right. There is nothing about policy in TARGETS section. 
But there is no "POLICYTARGETS" section! :D
> My opinion is ACCEPT and DROP only are valid policies. I don't know
> where I have this idea from but I'm pretty sure that other targets have
> not sense in policy context.
>
> -- Petr
I agree! I was just curious. :D

Swifty



      reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11 10:14 Policy targets Gáspár Lajos
2007-05-11 10:21 ` Pedro Gonçalves
2007-05-11 10:34   ` Gáspár Lajos
     [not found]     ` <46444B26.6010206@gmail.com>
2007-05-11 11:03       ` Gáspár Lajos
     [not found]         ` <46488357.90209@vlsmaps.com>
2007-05-15  9:03           ` Gáspár Lajos
2007-05-15 11:13 ` Petr Pisar
2007-05-21 16:13   ` Gáspár Lajos [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4651C50D.7080605@freemail.hu \
    --to=swifty@freemail.hu \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=xpisar@fi.muni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox