From: "Gáspár Lajos" <swifty@freemail.hu>
To: Petr Pisar <xpisar@fi.muni.cz>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Policy targets...
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:13:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4651C50D.7080605@freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrnf4j5ek.ic3.xpisar@album.ics.muni.cz>
Hi!
Petr Pisar írta:
> On 2007-05-11, G?sp?r Lajos <swifty@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was reading the iptables manual because I needed the correct arguments
>> of the policy (-P) command.
>> Here it is:
>>
>> -P, --policy chain target
>> Set the policy for the chain to the given target. See the
>> section TARGETS for the legal targets. Only built-in (non-user-defined)
>> chains can
>> have policies, and neither built-in nor user-defined
>> chains can be policy targets.
>>
>> So I checked the TARGETS.
>>
>> TARGETS
>> A firewall rule specifies criteria for a packet, and a target.
>> If the packet does not match, the next rule in the chain is the
>> examined; if it does
>> match, then the next rule is specified by the value of the
>> target, which can be the name of a user-defined chain or one of the
>> special values ACCEPT,
>> DROP, QUEUE, or RETURN.
>>
>> My question is: What is the difference between the ACCEPT and the RETURN
>> target in policy ??? :D
>>
>>
> I think this is missunderstadning in man page. If you read the TARGETS
> section carefully you could see here is nothing about policy even if -P
> paragraph referres to it.
>
Okay. That is right. There is nothing about policy in TARGETS section.
But there is no "POLICYTARGETS" section! :D
> My opinion is ACCEPT and DROP only are valid policies. I don't know
> where I have this idea from but I'm pretty sure that other targets have
> not sense in policy context.
>
> -- Petr
I agree! I was just curious. :D
Swifty
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 10:14 Policy targets Gáspár Lajos
2007-05-11 10:21 ` Pedro Gonçalves
2007-05-11 10:34 ` Gáspár Lajos
[not found] ` <46444B26.6010206@gmail.com>
2007-05-11 11:03 ` Gáspár Lajos
[not found] ` <46488357.90209@vlsmaps.com>
2007-05-15 9:03 ` Gáspár Lajos
2007-05-15 11:13 ` Petr Pisar
2007-05-21 16:13 ` Gáspár Lajos [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4651C50D.7080605@freemail.hu \
--to=swifty@freemail.hu \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=xpisar@fi.muni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox