From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Hambourg Subject: Re: two subnets... Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: <46B092DD.7030700@plouf.fr.eu.org> References: <46ADBDF0.3020200@mp.pl> <46AF4FC7.1000500@riverviewtech.net> <46AF8D63.8080900@interia.pl> <46AF9694.1060709@riverviewtech.net> <46AFBA57.3040702@mailinator.com> <46AFC5BB.7050701@riverviewtech.net> <20070801133804.GB8336@outback.rfc2324.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070801133804.GB8336@outback.rfc2324.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hello, Maximilian Wilhelm a =E9crit : > Am Tuesday, den 31 July hub Grant Taylor folgendes in die Tasten: >=20 >>I have never worked with the physdev match extension so I can not say=20 >>for sure. I do not recall which features were being taken out of main=20 >>line NetFilter code, but I want to say that physdev was one of them [..= .] >=20 > The physdev match is in the vanilla kernel for some time now. AFAIK, the physdev match for iptables is in the 2.6 vanilla kernel since=20 version 2.6.0 (as well as bridge-neftilter) and has never been removed.=20 The physdev match for ip6tables was added in version 2.6.9.