From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Subject: Re: REJECT target not as policy
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:43:48 +0200
Message-ID: <46C9E0E4.2080200@plouf.fr.eu.org>
References: <20070820135206.GA18644@bart.bertram-scharpf.homelinux.com>	<200708201608.39032.r.laban@ism.nl>	<46C9B8A2.5040201@plouf.fr.eu.org>
	<20070820174642.GA22613@bart.bertram-scharpf.homelinux.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070820174642.GA22613@bart.bertram-scharpf.homelinux.com>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Bertram Scharpf a =E9crit :
>=20
> On an other list I was told it were a good idea to set
> REJECT as policy.

I could be a good idea if it was possible. Maybe the person who told you=20
mixed up iptables and ipchains, its "predecessor" for 2.2 kernels. IIRC=20
ipchains allowed REJECT as a policy.