* NAT preformance and table processing
@ 2007-08-09 17:33 Július Bemš
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Július Bemš @ 2007-08-09 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hi,
I wrote some performance tests of NAT table. The main idea is, that I add
10000 random+senseless rules to the NAT table (snat, postrouting) and then
I add some rule to specific position which will stop traversing of NAT
table. I use UDP packets.
When I insert my reasonable rule to position 2000 and run my test, it shows
delay of packets cca 300ms. But when I run it more times, this delay is 2ms.
I don't understand why, because I use UDP(connectionless) - so I think, that
netfilter must process each packet and find appropriate rule. Is this true?
Or does netfilter do some optimalization? Because this behavior is expected
in TCP, but not UDP.
Thanks for replies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-08-09 17:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-09 17:33 NAT preformance and table processing Július Bemš
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox