From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Taylor Subject: Re: Multihomed Problem Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:55:30 -0600 Message-ID: <475F1562.7060207@riverviewtech.net> References: <475EFFF8.1010606@nwcascades.com> <475F095A.7040003@riverviewtech.net> <1197412206.19486.115.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1197412206.19486.115.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mail List - Netfilter On 12/11/07 16:30, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > You wouldn't need to set up NAT if both IPs on the gnu/linux box are > the gateways for the respective networks. Just enable forwarding: Agreed. I answered the question as if the multihomed system was not the router. If the multihomed system is the router or if the router knows about all subnets, direct routing (not NATing) would probably be the better approach. > No NAT required, the linux box is aware of the subnets and will pass > traffic happily between them. So long as firewalling is not in the say, yes. Grant. . . .