From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jack Lauman Subject: Re: Multihomed Problem Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:09:56 -0800 Message-ID: <47603204.8060200@nwcascades.com> References: <475EFFF8.1010606@nwcascades.com> <475F095A.7040003@riverviewtech.net> <1197412206.19486.115.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu> <475F1562.7060207@riverviewtech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <475F1562.7060207@riverviewtech.net> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Grant Taylor Cc: Mail List - Netfilter Hi, IP forwarding is turned on. I've tried several different routing statements but none seemed to work. What's the correct procedure to do this? Thanks, Jack Grant Taylor wrote: > On 12/11/07 16:30, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >> You wouldn't need to set up NAT if both IPs on the gnu/linux box are >> the gateways for the respective networks. Just enable forwarding: > > Agreed. I answered the question as if the multihomed system was not the > router. > > If the multihomed system is the router or if the router knows about all > subnets, direct routing (not NATing) would probably be the better approach. > >> No NAT required, the linux box is aware of the subnets and will pass >> traffic happily between them. > > So long as firewalling is not in the say, yes. > > > > > Grant. . . . > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >