From: David at roamware <david@roamware.co.uk>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Failing to get forwarding to work fully.
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:40:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A642E4.5040006@roamware.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000c01c86688$e22637c0$a672a740$@info>
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
>> I have tried to get this iptables script on my Centos 4.4 machine
>> working, with some help, but still have not succeeded in forwarding
>> port 722 to a machine on the LAN attached to the machine running
>> iptables attached to the internet. The logging of the FORWARD
>> packets just before drop tells me they are being forwarded. I also
>> made sure the the LAN attached machine on eth0 does accept ssh -D
>> 722 once I logged into the public facing machine via ssh. So I kinda
>> assume it is the return packet that is the problem, but cannot see
>> why. Ideas? 333.333.333.333 is substituted for the public IP addr,
>> 111.111.111.111 222.222.222.222 are machines I want to be the only
>> ones that can access. eth0 is the LAN NIC and eth1 is the public
>> facing NIC.
>>
>> # Generated by iptables-save v1.2.11 on Thu Dec 15 17:00:25 2005
>> *filter
>>
>
> [...]
>
>
>> -A FORWARD -j LOG --log-level debug
>> -A FORWARD -d 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 -i eth1 -o eth0 \
>> -p tcp -m multiport --dports 22,3306 -m state --state NEW \
>> -j ACCEPT
>>
>
> So NEW packets forwarded to port 22 will be allowed.
>
>
>> -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -m state \
>> --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
>>
>
> Here you are only accepting packets from eth1 -> eth0 in a RELATED or
> ESTABLISHED connection. What about the return packets that will go from
> eth0 -> eth1? I really don't think you can setup a connection this way.
> Try:
>
> -A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
>
Tried this, it made no difference. I broadened the ports on the NEW to
cover 722, so there was no confusion to the port 22 used to connect to
the machine with the public facing NIC. Do I need a postrouting rule for
the FORWARD used for the return packets?
David
>
> Grts,
> Rob
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-03 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 16:53 Failing to get forwarding to work fully David at roamware
2008-02-03 17:19 ` Rob Sterenborg
2008-02-03 22:40 ` David at roamware [this message]
2008-02-04 6:29 ` Rob Sterenborg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-03 16:52 David Wynter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A642E4.5040006@roamware.co.uk \
--to=david@roamware.co.uk \
--cc=david@stpenable.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox