Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Sven Riedel <sr@securenet.de>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Transfer stalls with NAT under 2.6.24.3
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:24:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EA1653.3080300@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47EA0DAB.7080205@securenet.de>

Sven Riedel wrote:
> Hi,
> I've run into a strange problem where large file transfers start 
> stalling over a NATed connection. Packet traces reveal that ACK 
> packets are sometimes not being passed through to the inside (NATed) 
> host, which results in a transfer stall until a tcp timeout occurrs 
> and the other side retransmits the ACK.
>
> This only seems to happen if the conntrack table on the firewall 
> already contains an entry for the same source and destination in 
> TIME_WAIT state. If no conntrack entries exist for the same source and 
> destination, the packets flow fine.
>
> The problem seems to be alevated by setting ip_conntrac_tcp_be_liberal 
> to 1, but this seems to be only a workaround not a real solution.
>
> Scatter gather and tcp segment offloading have been disabled in the 
> relevant NICs on the firewall during debugging, to make sure this 
> isn't a hardware issue.
>
> Is this issue known/is there a patch available or would further 
> information be needed to help debug the problem?

2.6.24.3 includes a patches that was supposed to fix problems
with connections in TIME_WAIT state. Does 2.6.24.2 work better
for you?

Please enable conntrack logging for TCP by executing:

echo 6 >/proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_log_invalid

and check whether you get any messages in the ring buffer.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-26  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-26  8:47 Transfer stalls with NAT under 2.6.24.3 Sven Riedel
2008-03-26  9:24 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-03-26 10:21   ` Sven Riedel
2008-03-26 15:47     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-03-26 18:45       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-03-26 19:16         ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2008-03-31  6:53         ` Sven Riedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47EA1653.3080300@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sr@securenet.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox