From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iptables vs. Linux kernel version question
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:39:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EE629E.8040104@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080329110322.9035678C75@gam.mel.teaser.net>
Hello,
Noino a écrit :
> Is the a correspondence to be obeyed between the versions of the Linux
> kernel version & the iptables program ?
> Specifically, I run a Linux kernel 2.6.5. My actual version of iptables
> is 1.2.9. Can I replace the latter with an up-to-date version without
> conflict (or else, up to which version?)
I have successully used an old iptables 1.2.11 with a recent Linux
kernel 2.6.24, but not the other way around.
> - and in the positive, is there
> anything to be gained from a new iptables program working with the older
> kernel ?
- Bug fixes.
- If the old iptables is older than the kernel, support for some new
matches, targets and options. For exemple the "comment" match support
requires Linux kernel >= 2.6.9 and iptables >= 1.3.0. (OK, this match
may not be interesting enough to justify an upgrade)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-29 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-29 11:03 iptables vs. Linux kernel version question Noino
2008-03-29 15:39 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47EE629E.8040104@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox