Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Elliott <lukester_null@yahoo.co.uk>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: intended behavior of REDIRECT
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:10:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4804EF83.7080004@yahoo.co.uk> (raw)

Hi

I'm trying to figure out the intended behavior of a REDIRECT rule such as:

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 9002 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 
9003-9004

I'd like to balance connections to port 9002 across the two servers on 
ports 9003 and 9004. Using the --random (or --random 1 with iptables 
1.3.8...) option works, but what should the non-random rule actually do?

Digging around in the 2.6.24 kernel it seems to boil down to 
tcp_unique_tuple() in nf_nat_proto_tcp.c. The interesting bit:

    static u_int16_t port;

    ...

    for (i = 0; i < range_size; i++, port++) {
        *portptr = htons(min + port % range_size);
        if (!nf_nat_used_tuple(tuple, ct))
            return 1;
    }


So if I'm reading this correctly, _port_ will only get incremented once 
an in use tuple is hit. And assuming there are no other rules in place, 
that means only after 64K-ish connections from a single host to port 
9002? This seems to be what I see in practice - "everything" gets 
forwarded to port 9003 (though TBH I've only tried a few hundred 
connections).

So presumably the intention is not to round-robin connections, something 
like:

    for (i = 0; i < range_size; i++) {
        *portptr = htons(min + port % range_size);
        ++port;
        if (!nf_nat_used_tuple(tuple, ct))
            return 1;
    }

(Though no doubt that breaks lots of other usages of the function...)

An insight gratefully received!

Regards

Luke Elliott.


             reply	other threads:[~2008-04-15 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-15 18:10 Luke Elliott [this message]
2008-04-25 15:25 ` intended behavior of REDIRECT Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4804EF83.7080004@yahoo.co.uk \
    --to=lukester_null@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox