From: Luke Elliott <lukester_null@yahoo.co.uk>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: intended behavior of REDIRECT
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:10:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4804EF83.7080004@yahoo.co.uk> (raw)
Hi
I'm trying to figure out the intended behavior of a REDIRECT rule such as:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 9002 -j REDIRECT --to-ports
9003-9004
I'd like to balance connections to port 9002 across the two servers on
ports 9003 and 9004. Using the --random (or --random 1 with iptables
1.3.8...) option works, but what should the non-random rule actually do?
Digging around in the 2.6.24 kernel it seems to boil down to
tcp_unique_tuple() in nf_nat_proto_tcp.c. The interesting bit:
static u_int16_t port;
...
for (i = 0; i < range_size; i++, port++) {
*portptr = htons(min + port % range_size);
if (!nf_nat_used_tuple(tuple, ct))
return 1;
}
So if I'm reading this correctly, _port_ will only get incremented once
an in use tuple is hit. And assuming there are no other rules in place,
that means only after 64K-ish connections from a single host to port
9002? This seems to be what I see in practice - "everything" gets
forwarded to port 9003 (though TBH I've only tried a few hundred
connections).
So presumably the intention is not to round-robin connections, something
like:
for (i = 0; i < range_size; i++) {
*portptr = htons(min + port % range_size);
++port;
if (!nf_nat_used_tuple(tuple, ct))
return 1;
}
(Though no doubt that breaks lots of other usages of the function...)
An insight gratefully received!
Regards
Luke Elliott.
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-15 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-15 18:10 Luke Elliott [this message]
2008-04-25 15:25 ` intended behavior of REDIRECT Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4804EF83.7080004@yahoo.co.uk \
--to=lukester_null@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox