From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Subject: Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:34:13 -0500
Message-ID: <4808B165.8020606@riverviewtech.net>
References: <48086990.5060000@juntadeandalucia.es> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804181232400.26385@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804181232400.26385@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>

On 04/18/08 05:35, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> IF you do bridge, then despite cabling being correct, you get a NAT 
> shortcircuit: jengelh.medozas.de/images/dnat-mistake.png

Jan, *VERY* nicely done depiction of the problem.  That is what I 
usually refer as a "TCP Triangle".



Grant. . . .