From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Loopback security...
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:31:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480F0209.4070902@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrng0sju6.dhr.petr.pisar@album.ics.muni.cz>
Petr Pisar a écrit :
>
> No. Loopback interface is just another dummy interface to be able to
> assign node scope adresses from 127.0.0.0/8 block. The reason for
> loopback is somobedy wants to have (node scoped) IP socket on machine with
> no real interfaces. It's just a historical relict because IP address
> needs an interface in Linux.
I disagree. The loopback interface is very different from a dummy
interface. A dummy interface is just a black hole, it cannot do what the
loopback interface does. The loopback interface loops the traffic back
to the host and the kernel knows about it, this is what makes it unique.
> E.g. I know about people running IPv6 networks where each router has
> globally routable addresses on loopaback interface, real ethernet
> interfaces between routers have only link scope addresses and a
> dynamic routing protocol (e.g, OSPF) is used to solve routing via
> network. And of course it works.
So what ? You can do the same with IPv4 and it will work too, at least
on Linux.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 2:05 Loopback security Grant Taylor
2008-04-22 11:01 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-04-22 14:08 ` Grant Taylor
2008-04-22 16:04 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-22 19:43 ` Grant Taylor
2008-04-23 10:51 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-25 20:00 ` Grant Taylor
2008-04-22 20:51 ` Petr Pisar
2008-04-23 9:31 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2008-04-23 9:45 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-04-22 16:50 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-04-22 20:07 ` Grant Taylor
2008-04-22 20:25 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-04-23 0:38 ` Grant Taylor
2008-04-23 9:07 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-23 9:44 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-22 19:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-22 20:16 ` Grant Taylor
2008-04-23 15:22 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-25 20:11 ` Grant Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480F0209.4070902@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox