From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Tonk <tnbt@arcor.de>
Subject: Re: DNAT IPSec
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:58:29 +0200
Message-ID: <48111095.6070903@arcor.de>
References: <4810F8AD.4020801@arcor.de> <48110D91.7070104@arcor.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <48110D91.7070104@arcor.de>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Tom Tonk wrote:
> problem is solved by using simply routing instead of NAT.

but anyway, would be interesting to know if the whole setup would also work 
with DNAT of a service on the NAT machine to the internal box?!