From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Subject: Re: Loopback security...
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:11:30 -0500
Message-ID: <48123AF2.5080608@riverviewtech.net>
References: <480D47F6.9080808@riverviewtech.net> <480DC570.80303@solutti.com.br> <480DF156.5060801@riverviewtech.net> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804222145350.13697@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <480E4784.3060905@riverviewtech.net> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804231719390.13697@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804231719390.13697@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>

On 4/23/2008 10:22 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> If you look at the diff of 1e637 to its parent (i.e.=C2 "the patch" a=
s=20
> one could say :-)  you see ipv4_is_loopback in the context around it;=
=20
> among it in a few files, this function causes "special handling".

*nod*



Grant. . . .