From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DNAT routing problem
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:20:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48245DCB.6060905@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3598a5460805090630m2676a18dp9f25e7ca9efb9ca9@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/09/08 08:30, Andrea Ranieri wrote:
> My previous tests involved a ipv4 flow going always from 10.0.5.2 to
> 10.0.6.2, and the results remains those I wrote in my first mail. Now
> I tried to change the source IP, and finally, the natting process
> begins. But obiviously with a strange behavior...
(See below.)
> In this test I always have the 10.0.5.2->10.0.6.2 flow running, and a
> 10.0.5.[2 to 5]->10.0.6.2 flow. Every IP except the .2 get natted.
> The .2 remains unchanged. Moreover, when i flush the nat table, the
> rule disappear but .3, .4 and .5 IPs continue to get natted. I think
> that's a cache problem.
This really makes me believe that you are dealing with what connection
tracking thinks is an on going existing established flow / connection.
Remember that the NAT table only sees the first packet of a connection.
So if you are altering your NAT table after a connection is
established it will name make any difference to the existing connection.
This is further exemplified by you testing .3-.5 and seeing them start
to change and then continue doing what they were when you flush your NAT
table. I think you will find that if you stop your connections, wait a
few minutes, and then start them back up they will behave as expected.
> It's time to put feet in the mouth, isn't it? ^___^
Na. ;)
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 18:17 DNAT routing problem Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-08 19:37 ` Grant Taylor
2008-05-09 10:48 ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-09 13:04 ` Cloves Pereira Costa Jr
2008-05-09 13:30 ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-09 14:20 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2008-05-09 16:34 ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-09 17:55 ` Grant Taylor
2008-05-10 8:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-12 16:40 ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-10 8:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48245DCB.6060905@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox