Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@alust.homeunix.com>
To: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:53:37 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <482E56C1.2070508@alust.homeunix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482DA25D.70703@plouf.fr.eu.org>

Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Alexei Ustyuzhaninov a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I have a weird with the same scenario: after rerouting a packet goes
>>>> out through another interface but keeps the source address of the 
>>>> original interface.
>>>
>>> Yes that is ... how the code is currently written it seems.
> 
> The source address is chosen before the packet is sent to the OUTPUT 
> chains, and cannot be changed by the rerouting code, this would break 
> things such as connection tracking. It requires stateful NAT so the 
> correct original address is put back in replies. By the way, DNAT in the 
> OUTPUT chain used to implicitly change the source address when the new 
> destination address caused the output interface to change until kernel 
> 2.6.11.

Hm. That's not clear to me as I don't know the destination address in 
advance (and don't want to change it). Anyhow this solution is obsolete 
as I see.

>> Well, maybe you can suggest how to work around this? :) I tried snat, 
>> but this solution seems not to work.
> 
> SNAT should work on packets creating a new connection (i.e. in the state 
> NEW).

Yes, really! The SYN packet goes out through the right interface with 
the right source address, SYN/ACK comes back and that's all, nothing 
will happen more.

Anyhow  isn't this problem unresolvable in general? I just want a simple 
thing: to send mail via one provider and all other traffic via the other 
provider,

-- 
Thanks,
Alexei

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-17  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-07 14:36 fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question pthyseba
2008-05-07 15:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-11 16:23   ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov
2008-05-11 17:39     ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-11 17:50       ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov
2008-05-16 15:03         ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-05-17  3:53           ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov [this message]
2008-05-17 10:49             ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-05-17 12:37               ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov
2008-05-17 23:26                 ` Pascal Hambourg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=482E56C1.2070508@alust.homeunix.com \
    --to=alust@alust.homeunix.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox