From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Subject: Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:36:18 +0200
Message-ID: <482EC332.9000400@plouf.fr.eu.org>
References: <1210688686.2956.69.camel@kr0sty.1.com.ar>	 <482DA36B.6070801@plouf.fr.eu.org>	 <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805161714090.15590@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>	 <482DAC09.90304@plouf.fr.eu.org> <1210954048.23968.2777.camel@kr0sty.1.com.ar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1210954048.23968.2777.camel@kr0sty.1.com.ar>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Martin a =E9crit :
>=20
> So I've just one question at least. If there aren't nf_conntrack_*
> modules or aliases, does the amanda, ftp, quake3, etc. modules work j=
ust
> loading nf_conntrack?

I don't understand. What "amanda, ftp, quake3, etc. modules" are you=20
talking about if there "aren't nf_conntrack_* modules" ?